MANH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 12.63%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Bentley Systems's return on equity of 40.23%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $267.13, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Bentley Systems has an analysts' consensus of $56.58 which suggests that it could grow by 24.13%. Given that Bentley Systems has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Bentley Systems is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bentley Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bentley Systems offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are smaller than Bentley Systems quarterly revenues of $335.2M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is higher than Bentley Systems's net income of $42.3M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.49x while Bentley Systems's PE ratio is 41.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 13.29x versus 11.58x for Bentley Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 3.48%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of 2.37%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $267.13, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $210.51 which suggests that it could grow by 1.53%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.955%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $262.9M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.49x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 575.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 13.29x versus 16.74x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of -9.14%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $267.13, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $0.95 which suggests that it could grow by 98.33%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.49x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 13.29x versus 0.85x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 22.41%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $267.13, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $195.36 which suggests that it could grow by 20.58%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.865%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.49x while Oracle's PE ratio is 39.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 13.29x versus 8.38x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.